Brock May
Posts : 15
Join date : 2010-12-29
Age : 33
Location : Grand Rapids, Michigan
 |  Subject: CCD>CMOS Discussion  Fri Dec 31, 2010 1:23 am | |
| Its the truth. If you want real HD footage, CCD's are the way to go. And I dont give a fuck how good CMOS footage looks from a DSLR, that's just the lens pulling the weight. Wait until 2011 when Canon comes out with the first DSLR with 3CCD's, your going to be MINDFUCKED. | |
|
josh
Guest
| | Subject: Re: CCD>CMOS Discussion Sat Jan 01, 2011 12:14 am | |
| nobody understands this shit.. i dont hahaha vx 4 lyfe dude handlez rock! |
|
John Radtke
Posts : 14
Join date : 2011-01-02
| | Subject: Re: CCD>CMOS Discussion Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:48 am | |
| | |
|
erik
Posts : 6
Join date : 2010-12-29
| | Subject: Re: CCD>CMOS Discussion Sun Jan 02, 2011 6:18 am | |
| yeah no one seems to realize the hv series uses cmos also.. sup disgusting jello footy. hdslrs can keep cmos sensors though, i can never tell they have them | |
|
Isaac Coy
Posts : 7
Join date : 2011-01-03
Location : NE Missouri.
| | Subject: Re: CCD>CMOS Discussion Mon Jan 03, 2011 1:40 am | |
| i havent really noticed the horrid effect of cmos on my hv30.. | |
|
Brian Boston
Posts : 11
Join date : 2010-12-28
| | Subject: Re: CCD>CMOS Discussion Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:47 pm | |
| Eww at CMOS rolling shutter and eww at CCD bleeding reds. I'll take the bleeding reds over CMOS shutter though, yuck. | |
|
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: CCD>CMOS Discussion | |
| |
|
